The Time is Right(2nd print)

Happy Sixth Birthday to boomboomsroom.com today.

With that milestone comes bad news and good news.  Which one first?

Ok, the bad news.  The site won’t see a seventh birthday.  BBR is going night night.

Ah, the good news?  Or, the great news?

Behind the curtain, the staff has been formatting a new website to continue to bring the content.

It’s thependulumswings.com.  You can expect more of the same content, with an updated look, simplified format, shiny new color, and a rebrand.

Sometimes, it’s time. Like a divided America, we think it’s time to freshen up and hope the pendulum will swing back to the center to regain some sanity, normalcy, and sensibility.

Starting next week the email that informs you of fresh content and links you to it will continue to head your way.  It will just come from thependulumswings.com, not BBR.

To ease the transition today’s notification will repeat on Thursday and Friday to catch all who catch us.

Please alert anyone you know who visits our site without subscribing to join us at the new URL.  Or, send them a link when we start the content.

Comments, criticisms, and concerns are always welcome.

See you on the other side next week.

 

 

 

The Time Is Right

Happy Sixth Birthday to boomboomsroom.com today.

With that milestone comes bad news and good news.  Which one first?

Ok, the bad news.  The site won’t see a seventh birthday.  BBR is going night night.

Ah, the good news?  Or, the great news?

Behind the curtain, the staff has been formatting a new website to continue to bring the content.

It’s thependulumswings.com.  You can expect more of the same content, with an updated look, simplified format, shiny new color, and a rebrand.

Sometimes, it’s time. Like a divided America, we think it’s time to freshen up and hope the pendulum will swing back to the center to regain some sanity, normalcy, and sensibility.

Starting next week the morning email that informs you of fresh content and links you to it will continue to head your way.  It will just come from thependulumswings.com, not BBR.

To ease the transition today’s notification will repeat on Thursday and Friday to catch all who catch us.

Please, please alert anyone you know who visits our site without subscribing to join us at the new URL.  Or, send them a link when we start the content.

Comments, criticisms, and concerns are always welcome.

See you on the other side next week.

 

 

 

A Political Touchdown

Tune in to almost any NFL game since the George Floyd riots and you’ll see the friendly reminders in the back of each endzone.  One end has “END RACISM” in all caps.  The other reminds “IT TAKES ALL OF US.”

When you put them together you get “It takes all of us to end racism.”  Indeed.

This past weekend, one message was simplified to “VOTE.”

Last Monday the Harris/Walz team was doing their part.  They unveiled an “Opportunity Agenda” plan for Black men, which includes a proposal of forgivable loans of up to $20,000 to Black entrepreneurs.

But, wait, there’s more.  They also pledged to support federal marijuana legalization, a big step beyond the Biden administration’s current stance. Harris “will break down unjust legal barriers that hold Black men and other Americans back by legalizing marijuana nationally,” her campaign spokesperson articulated.

Pollsters in the field in early October found that roughly 15% of Black likely voters planned to vote for Trump in November. This is 6 percentage points higher than Biden’s final margin with Black voters in the 2020 race.

But, politics likely has nothing to do with this.  This is about righting a wrong or two.

Could you be more racist than offering a handout to a specific race and gender while excluding others?  Maybe.  Try specifically offering to make an illegal substance legal cause Black men are disproportionately using said substance.

BBR attempted to contact the Harris Campaign to see if they have any plans to better working conditions at convenience stores for Indian Americans.  At press time, we had not received a response.

Even Joe Biden, way back in 2008 was sounding the alarm bells.

“In Delaware, the largest growth in population is Indian-Americans moving from India. You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking,” Biden said.

It takes all of us.  No joke.

What’s a forgivable loan anyway?  Think 10k for an EV.  Think 5k for increased childcare credit.  Think 25k for first-time homebuyers.  Think student loans.  Think handout.  And, there’s no better time to promise yet another handout than two weeks before an election.

But, don’t think American debt.  It’s called forgivable for a reason. It sounds so nice. If you called it a handout or a government subsidy it doesn’t sound as appealing.  It reminds us of the transformation of “abortion” to “women’s healthcare.”

Remember, Donald Trump is a racist.

A vote for him is a vote to return to the Jim Crow days.

Wouldn’t you rather have a chicken in every pot?

Get money, get high, get in that booth, and vote for Kamala.

Touchdown!

 

 

 

 

The Bar Is Low

A funny thing happened last night on the FOX News Channel.  After the Bret Baier interview with VP Kamala Harris aired the remainder of the nightly lineup took turns running excerpts of it and picking apart what Kamala said and didn’t say.

It’s as if they captured the villain queen and walked her about the town square showing the faithful that better days lie ahead.

The funny thing about the entire trial, conviction, and sentencing is that most people who watch FOX regularly and repeatedly greatly dislike Harris.  And most people who like Harris greatly dislike FOX.

Baier exposed many of Harris’ flaws, flip-flops, and falsehoods.  He insisted that her word salads only be served in small portions.  But did it move the needle 19 days out?

This brings us to the question, “Who is the worst US Presidential Candidate in our lifetime?”

George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, and John McCain come to mind.

If Madame VP loses will she join the list?  Maybe.  She had little time to prepare for this and her long suit isn’t preparation.  Her stance on most any issue is greatly determined by which way the wind is blowing.

If Donald J. Trump loses will he join the list?

For the record, William J. Bryan is the only three-time loser.  Who?  He lost in 1896, 1900, and 1904.  Trump would join a short list of other two-time losers.

But has anyone ever faced two weaker candidates than Biden and Harris?  Opinions vary, but they would be tough to beat, meaning they should be easy to defeat.

Ok, ok the media is biased, the DOJ is weaponized, and the ballot boxes are supposedly stuffed.

Trump has run a terrible campaign pure and simple.

First, women are mad.  And when women get angry they get even and then some.   His failure to clearly and loudly articulate his stance on abortion might be a fatal flaw.

Should he have picked Tulsi Gabbard as his VP nominee and women’s health czar?  A woman talking to headstrong women about women’s things usually goes better than any man on earth attempting the same.

Trump himself has had a few struggles with the female population along the way.

His deficit with white female voters offsets his lead or relatively good position in every other demographic.  Sure he’s losing with blacks and Hispanics, but his percentage of likely voters is enough for him to win when you combine it with old, white, angry men.

While that could be his biggest undoing, his inability to succinctly articulate why he’s the answer and her radical left positions aren’t is another.

Amazingly in this divided country, there are/were undecided voters.  Holding rallies and droning on about the past isn’t how you win them over.  He could have used a drone at one rally, but we digress.

Further, he habitually insults factions with name-calling and derogatory comments.

With Michigan very much in play, this week he called out car factory workers, “They just assemble parts “out of a box” and says children could do their jobs: “We could have our child do it.”

The UAW was unimpressed.

How childish.

Childish might describe his inability to let go of the 2020 election results.  Ego might describe it too.  That allows the “our democracy is at stake” nonsense to hit the airwaves.

But the biggest reason he might join the list of bad candidates is that he’s running against one who is worse.  The bar is low.

Even the Dems know that.

 

Have You Heard the One…?

With the election just three weeks from today, united is not where we stand.

The real-time debt clock shows the nation roaring to 36 trillion bucks in the proverbial hole.

The 30-year mortgage interest rate sits at 7.25%.

The nation’s indifference to illegal border crossings is causing harm from coast to coast to how we live and how safe we feel.

Israel, Palestine, surrogates for Iran, Ukraine, and Russia are playing ready, fire, aim.  China is itching to join the fray and Taiwan is squared up in the scope.

The Donald apparently won’t debate Kamala.  Either his camp feels comfortable with where they are, or they didn’t like his performance six weeks ago.

Kamala is venturing into the enemy’s den.  She’ll answer (insert word salad) FOX Nightly News host Bret Baier’s questions tomorrow night.  Either her camp feels uncomfortable with polling, or they liked her performance on the tele recently.

But the most important debate is whether or not Tim Walz is or is not a hunter and was or wasn’t a gun owner.  Did you see him and a few of his friends working the field for pheasants over the weekend?

It started with him not being able to load his gun.  His hunting gear looked brand spanking new and matched his fellow hunters down to the sock color.  Hmm.

This wasn’t a photo op aimed at rural Midwestern males, was it?

He didn’t shoot anything, or anyone for that matter, which makes him way a way more qualified VP candidate than Dick Cheney.  Dick lodged a few pellets in a then-78-year-old Texas attorney Harry Whittington’s jowls on a quail hunt.

The buckshot stops here!

Dan Quayle, thankfully, never shot a gun.  He did, however, take dead aim at his foot a time or nine.

And, the best news of all is that Donald J Trump hasn’t been shot at in weeks.

He needs to give the race his best shot with three weeks to go.  And what is he doing?  He’s holding a rally in Madison Square Garden in twelve days.

For what?

Ego we assume.  Does anyone on his team think he has a chance (not a shot) to pull NY’s 28 electoral college votes?

Maybe the million his campaign will drop for the joint will pay for itself in the coverage of it.  Maybe, it won’t.

Thankfully, we assume Kamala, who told us last week that she’s a proud gun owner, will pass through the metal detector on her way into the Fox News Building.

The Dems incessant plea for gun control may not be such a bad idea.  Look at how well it works in Chicago.

Psst.  Have you heard the one about what a pheasant, a Dick, a jowl, a Quayle, an egomaniac, and a Fox interview have in common?

They’re all irrelevant to the bigger picture.

Something’s burning and it isn’t Rome.

Dirty or Dry?

Four years ago Joe Biden said he was running for office because we were in a battle for the soul of our nation.

Shortly after he took office he instructed his VP, Kamala Harris, as Border Czar to get to the root cause of the border “problem.”

And four years later we have 15 million new souls illegally in our nation.  Biden was polling so well that he stepped away (was forced out) from his reelection campaign.

Enter the next anointed one.  Kamala said she is running to save our nation’s democracy.

She’s qualified based on the job she did at the border one would guess.  Or not.

As VP she’s recently intimately involved in federal disaster relief efforts.  Earlier this week she attempted to call Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to offer her and the nation’s assistance with fast approaching Hurricane Milton.  One problem.  Ron said she didn’t call this time or for past hurricanes either.

Right in the middle of football season, hurricanes became a political football.  Where’s FEMA?  North Carolina wants to know.  They’re there said Team Kamala.

Hurricanes hitting Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, and Florida twice might be god’s way of cleansing those heathen red states.  You know them as the ones who oppose abortions and love guns.

Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that our government was steering those storms.  Life was simpler when we only thought that the Russians were seeding our clouds.

That sounds as preposterous as the accusation by Hillary that Trump staffers were meeting with the Russians to interfere with our elections when Team Hillary was. Or does it?

Cue the climate change zealots.  These severe storms are further proof that climate change is upon us.  It’s not proof.  They’re more intense.  Except, they’re not.  They are more frequent.   Except, they’re not.

They’ve been around longer than any trees we’ve cut down to put up windmills that need generators to turn them when the wind doesn’t blow.  Trees take away CO2 so now we’re building CO2 capture facilities.  But we digress.

In the early fall in the south, two things are a given- football and hurricanes.

Climate change would be a hurricane in Wisconsin in February.

Hurricanes even have a dry side and a dirty side much like how martinis can be made.  Kamala might like them after all.

Hopefully, God spared all of those souls in Tampa and Orlando overnight.

Politics aside, they must vote soon to ensure we save our democracy.

Kamala said so.

 

VP Hannibal Lecture

Tuesday night it was JD Vance squaring off against Tim Walz.  Did you watch the possible VPs debate?

It’s debatable as to who won.

Ask most any Republican and they’ll go on camera, tweet, or tell you that it was JD Vance and it wasn’t close.  Ask almost any Democrat and they’ll explain in similar fashion that it was Coach Tim Walz and it wasn’t close.

These are the divided days that look at things in very different ways.

Perhaps most importantly did this debate sway many or even any undecided/independent voters in the few battleground states that inevitably will decide who the next President of the United States will be?

We’d venture a guess that lands between not likely and doubtful.  Why, you may ask.

When was the last time, if any time, that you voted for someone for the highest office in the land because of who their choice was for the second highest office in the land?

In 1861 Hannibal Hamlin served under Abe Lincoln.  He would have made a fine professor.  Hannibal Lecture.

In 1969 Richard Nixon had a clown named Spiro T Agnew as his right-hand man.  After months of maintaining his innocence, Agnew pleaded no contest to a single felony tax evasion charge and resigned from office.

Nixon was so damaged by his choice that he selected Gerald Ford as his replacement.  And, with a little help from perusing Watergate, he was reelected in 1972.  Maybe he was not so damaged. Nixon resigned from office also, reminding us on the way, “I am not a crook!”

Who could forget Walter Mondale?  Everyone.

Take J Danforth Quayle.  Please.  Who knew that he had trouble spelling potato?  Or is it “potatoe?”  George Herbert Walker Bush didn’t.

Quayle would have had no shot in 2020.  Biden vowed to pick a woman for VP and a black woman for Justice of the Supreme Court if he were elected.  How do you spell DEI?

Voila.  There was/is VP and Border Czar Kamala Harris.  Along the way, Biden’s diminished capacity was evident in 2020 unless you didn’t want to see it.

What’s the history lesson?

America votes for the first name on the ballot, not the accompanying one.

Speaking of debates, will Trump go another round with Harris?  It seems like she is desirous and he is hesitant.  Is that because the polls show America favors him?  Or, is it because she won debate number one in the eyes of the watching public and he wants no part of round two?

This likely will come down to never-Trumpers, abortion enthusiasts, and J6 disdain vs. the economy, border, and threat of WWIII.

JD and Coach won’t have another go.

America doesn’t have enough interest.

 

 

 

Mass Mess

At multiple recent campaign stops Kamala Harris has appealed to the crowd, ” They have pledged to carry out the largest deportation, a mass deportation, in American history.  Imagine what that would look like and what that would be.”

Predictably her supporters clap and wave signs.  If you’re tolerant of illegal immigration you’re probably against deportation.

Donald Trump and his zealots see it quite differently.  He used the exact video of Kamala’s anti-deportation callout and added his name and approval at the end.   In other words, I am Donald J. Trump and I hope you not only imagine it but get to see it.

What would it look like? Millions of people and the government would be involved, so imagine a yuge mess.

It would look a lot like the unfettered illegal immigration of the last four years- a great big mess.

Eleven million (Trump says, “more, some would say many more, many many more”) aren’t going find the backpack they dropped walking in, pick it up, and head south.

Mexico let them walk out, but they aren’t going to let them walk back in.   Who would want the mess we’ve endured?  Not Mexico.

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles anyone?

Here’s a one-way ticket back to your country of origin.  We hope you enjoyed your stay on our dime, here’s another to fly back from whence you came.

JD Vance says we should take little bites out of deportation.  He’d start with any who have criminal records.  He’d move on to organized gangs, etc.

Make no mistake about it, the Border Czar has no plan to deport any just like she had no plan to prevent any from walking in.

Election season is here so now she wants to solve the border problem.  The polls tell her so.  Could someone ask her what she thinks the problem is at the border?  Would she be dumb enough to indict herself?  Maybe.

And, the irony of all ironies is her campaign is hooting and hollering about border crossings being down 55% last month, to the lowest since she took office.

Could it be that everyone who wants in is?   Did we make our bed and now get to lie in it?

Mass deportation likely isn’t the realistic answer any more than our  “no border” border policy of the last four years.  Two wrongs don’t make a right even if the right says so.

Perhaps there is a sensible solution that strikes some balance with who is here and gets to stay or go.

Future clarity is needed on who and how many will come here.  This country isn’t in the same place as in 1492 when Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

We have laws.  Or, we did.

 

Shooting Blanks

So, who won the debate?

Stated differently, who accomplished what they set out to do.   And, was the performance good enough to sway the few voters still undecided in key battleground states?

For Trump, the objective was to expose Harris for what she is, not the candidate “for change” she purports to be.  For Harris, the objective was to show that she was capable of holding the highest office in the land and to goad Trump into being Trump.  For ABC, owned by liberal Disney, the objective was to help Harris.

The BBR scorecard has it Trump 0, Harris won, ABC 4.

Trump unevenly attempted to attach Harris to her recent Biden/Harris past.  The economy, the border, and the world ablaze were ripe for the picking.  His message didn’t pin the mess on her.

He took the bait each time she tossed it.  “You have small crowds at your rally and they leave early.”  “We have big crowds, great crowds.  Some say the biggest crowds ever. They don’t leave early.”   Who cares?  Trump’s ego cares.  And, it always gets in the way.

His MAGA platform from 2016 has changed very little.  On substance, that might be fine.  On style, it seems tired and more importantly, it doesn’t bring fence-sitters to the right.

“I had the greatest economy some say ever.  Most say ever.  Putin wouldn’t invade if I were in office.  The war will be over if I’m elected before I take office.”

I.  I.  I.  Ego. Ego.  Ego.

People want to see a better tomorrow for themselves not argue about the past.  Tell us how you’d end the war.

Don’t you have a plan to enlist influential business leaders to help you shrink government?  Not a peep last night.

Trump’s wandering unscripted diatribes are old.

Harris is scripted because she’s an actress playing a role.  Low-information voters like style.

She’s played many to get here because she has no defined principles.  She’s for or against defunding the police.  She’s for or against gun confiscation.  She practically eliminated the border and now she’s for a tougher border.

She’ll tackle inflation on her first day in office.  She’s in office now.

If her presidential bid fails she can pocket some big coin doing a commercial next summer for flip-flops.

Her Opportunity Economic Plan is one big government giveaway.   Expand child credits.  Give first-time homebuyers down payment money.  Forgive the student’s debt and hand it to you.  Low-information voters like handouts.

ABC did its part to try to move the needle left.  They repeatedly “fact-checked” Trump even if he spoke factually.  CNN counted four times.  They didn’t fact-check Harris once even if she didn’t speak factually.

There was not a single question about the 35 trillion dollar debt.  Ms. Harris, how do you plan to pay for all of this?

Did this debate matter?  It’s doubtful that Trump gained any undecided nor took any from Harris.  Surely some undecided folks decided to move Harris’ way.

How many?  Is it enough to push her over the top?

Eight weeks ago, thank goodness, Trump dodged a bullet.

Last night he shot blanks.

There are eight weeks to go.

 

 

 

 

 

Yes and Yes

Here are two simple questions, but they come with one qualifying request.  The request is to put politics aside to answer them.

Question one: Do you believe freedom of speech is one of our most important rights?

Question two: Do you prefer a smaller but more efficient government than we have today?

Would anyone answer “no” to either question?

We strongly suspect that Elon Musk would answer with a loud “YES” to both. He’s at the center of both questions as the 2024 presidential election draws near.

Once upon a time, Musk was loved by the left.  Then he bought Twitter.  Now he’s not loved so much.

What happened?  What happened goes to the very core of both questions above.

Musk quickly ended the imbalance of censorship from the left on Twitter and in the process unwound the one-way definitions of disinformation, misinformation, and hate speech.

Ex-employees of the company now known as X

Along the way he kept asking employees at Twitter what they did for the company.  What is your job?  Incorrect was the answer “Umm.”

He quickly slashed a ton of dead weight on the payroll.  The social media platform now has only 1,500 employees, down from the 8,000 employed at the time of the acquisition.

Late last week he was drawn even nearer to the crux of the questions.

VP and Prez want-to-be Kamala Harris told CNN’s Jake Tapper that “he has lost his privileges and it should be taken down.  You can’t have one rule for Twitter and another for Facebook.  These social sites have to understand their power.  They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any oversight and regulation and that has to stop.”

Isn’t freedom of speech a right, not a privilege?  Who has oversight and regulates what Kamala says to millions and millions?  Maybe she doesn’t like Musk’s resistance to conform to government-approved narratives?

Marc Zuckerberg admitted last week that he wished that Facebook would have more overtly pushed back on the Biden/Harris administration’s multiple requests for FB to censor jokes or dissents to be published about the government’s position on Covid 19 back in 2021.  Well well.

Former President Trump is reportedly eyeing a plan to involve prominent business executives, including Elon, in auditing federal agencies to identify programs to cut.

Elon’s blue checkmark tweet response was,  “I can’t wait.  There is a lot of waste and needless regulation government that needs to go.”

Back up the Waste Management trucks to DC and start managing the waste.

Real free speech and real government cuts.

New Texas resident Elon Musk says “Giddyup!”